Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Der Warenkorb ist leer.
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.
El conde Lucanor
ISBN/GTIN

Produktbeschreibung

El conde Lucanor o Libro de los enxiemplos del conde Lucanor et de Patronio (entre 1325 y 1335), es un libro de relatos de don Juan Manuel. Se basan en fuentes orientales (sobre todo los apólogos del Sendebar y el Calila e Dimna) y cristianas (la Disciplina clericalis de Pedro Alfonso).Entre los cuentos destacanel sueño mágico de don Illán, que inspiró una comedia a Juan Ruiz de Alarcón;el de los tejedores que hicieron un paño invisible al rey, utilizado por Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra en El retablo de las maravillas;y el del mancebo casado con una mujer brava, que inspiró La fierecilla domada, de William Shakespeare.Con la finalidad de que sus escritos llegaran a un público lo más amplio posible, la estructura de la obra es siempre la misma: el conde Lucanor siempre que lo necesita propone a su sabio consejero Patronio un problema moral o social.Este, con el fin de que sirva de guía al conde, lo resuelve mediante un cuento, fábula o ejemplo. La moraleja siempre aparece al final en dos breves versos, los cuáles reciben el nombre de dísticos.El autor era, además, consciente de que los textos tenían que ser amenos, lejos de los tratados complejos del mester de clerecía o de la filosofía clásica que se habían quedado recluidos, cada vez más, en las bibliotecas monacales.El conde Lucanor presenta una gran variedad temática; salvación del alma, vanidad, hipocresía, justicia, honra, riqueza y amistad son algunos. Todos se exponen con fines didácticos.
Weiterlesen

Details

ISBN/GTIN978-84-9953-846-4
ProduktartBuch
EinbandGebunden
Erscheinungsdatum01.01.2024
Reihen-Nr.134
SpracheSpanisch
MasseBreite 157 mm, Höhe 235 mm, Dicke 20 mm
Gewicht570 g
Artikel-Nr.3741921
KatalogLibri
Datenquelle-Nr.A19739968
Weitere Details

Reihe

Bewertungen

Empfehlungen zu ähnlichen Produkten

Das neue "Delfi. Magazin für neue Literatur" hält sein Versprechen: Sowohl die Beiträge sind thematisch vielfältig, als auch die Auswahl der aktuellen literarischen Stimmen der deutschsprachigen und internationalen Literatur. Ein gelungener Versuch das Medium neu zu beleben.
Und der Wechsel in der Form ist überzeugend zwischen Prosa, Lyrik, Comic und Interview.
Ist ein Autor:innen-Leben eigentlich ohne die Lektüre von Franz Kafka möglich (und sinnvoll)? Die über 20 Beiträge dieses Bandes vermitteln den Leser:innen, dass es ohne ihn gar nicht geht. Und auch mein Leseleben hätte mit Abzug dieses vor 100 Jahren verstorbenen Autors anders ausgesehen. Ohne ihn wäre ich nicht zu Haruki Murakami oder Robert Gwisdek gekommen, hätte magisch-realistische Romane vielleicht anders (oder gar nicht?) rezipiert. Mit der Kafka-Brille ergab alles plötzlich viel mehr Sinn. Die Anthologie beweist aufs Beste, dass eben noch nicht alles gesagt und geschrieben wurde zum Werke Kafkas. Egal welche Erzählung, welchen Briefwechsel, welchen der unvollendeten Romane man anschaut - es gibt Jahr um Jahr neues zu erforschen. Egal, ob die Autor:innen dieses Bandes ihre eigene Schreibbiographie anhand von Kafka-Lektüren nachzeichnen oder ganz genau an einen Text herantreten, es macht als Kafka-Begeisterte Freude daran teilzuhaben. Im Kopf geblieben sind mir Isabelle Lehn, die über die Tagebücher schrieb und den Trost des Alleinseins mit sich und seinen Gedanken. Esther Kinsky nähert sich bspw. ebenfalls über die Tagebücher und Sasha Marianna Salzmann widmet sich einer queeren Lesart in der "Beschreibung eines Kampfes". Spannende Ansätze - und fragte man mich, hätte ich wohl über einen von Kafkas Tiertexten schreiben wollen - über seinen "Bericht für eine Akademie".
Wenn ich ehrlich sein soll, war ich nicht sonderlich begeistert über die Auswahl der Geschichten in dieser neuen Anthologie. "Auf dem Friedhof", "Die Mondfinsternis", "Statistik" & "Gejammer" sind vier wunderbar illustre Kurztexte, die hier überzeugen durch Tschechows Witz.
Die Langerzählungen über unglückliche Liebe(n) oder Affären reizten mich leider nicht: weder "Ariadna" noch "Späte Blumen" überzeugten. Das Sujet von Ariadna ist in "Die Dame mit dem Hündchen" so viel besser umgesetzt.
Tschechow als Beobachter der widrigen Zustände in der russischen Landbevölkerung, die Verarmung des Adels, der Standesdünkel ist nach wie vor gut porträtiert, aber der Band machte so gar keine Lust auf mehr. Bin etwas ratlos, was die Intention dieser Zusammenstellung war. (Unglückliche) Liebesgeschichten sind außerdem nicht Tschechows größte Stärke. Ach.
Insgesamt eine richtig schöne Anthologie, in der das Thema "Gefühle" aber wohl vorherrschender ist als der "Frühling". Blühende Landschaften und Gärten gibt es aber trotz allem hier und da zu erlesen und man kann den Kopf ruhig auch komplett literarisch ins Grüne tauchen bei Bedarf.
Trotz der Reichhaltigkeit anderer Bände mit Tschechow-Erzählungen, die ich in den letzten Jahren las, waren in dieser neuen Anthologie doch reichlich Texte dabei, die mir noch unbekannt waren. Ebenso große Freude machte aber auch das erneute Lesen bestimmter Werke, bspw. "Der schwarze Mönch", "Der Literaturlehrer", "Verotschka" und "Auf dem Fuhrwerk".
Die Mischung in diesem Band gelingt im Übrigen gar nicht so schlecht: es werden kurze heitere Erzählungen aus dem Frühwerk sehr passend mit etwas umfangreicheren eher tragischen Geschichten abgewechselt. Tschechow bekommt von mir ohnehin fast immer eine Empfehlung!
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
"Meine stille Nacht. 12 Geschichten vom Werden" versammelt Kurzgeschichten über besonders prägende Momente oder Lebensereignisse. Das Schreiben und ein Nachdenken während der Nacht ist den Texten gemein. Die Episoden sind thematisch breit gefächert und beschäftigen sich mit Momenten, die ein besonderes literarisches Innehalten in der Stille auslösten: Die Verantwortung für den richtigen Kindesnamen (Streeruwitz), den Unterschied zwischen Glauben und Wissen (Birnbacher), über Trauer und Sehnsucht (Ani), über Perseiden und Mauersegler (Wonneberger), und viele mehr (Schami, Grjasnowa, Franzobel,...). Literarische Impressionen für ruhige Momente.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
A short and comparatively easy-to-read British classic from 1886 about the duality of human nature. Stephenson's linguistic eloquence is a pleasure to consume!
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
A classic I ran across on my neverending to-read pile and finished within a few hours. The simple writing style made it enjoyable and easy to read, even if it was first published in 1900 and the language is somewhat rigid. It becoming a classic is well deserved - though I must say I'm not interested in the volumes that follow after this first one.

Autor/in

"Juan Manuel (Escalona, Toledo, 1282-1348). España.Era sobrino de Alfonso X el Sabio y nieto de Fernando III y pertenecía a la nobleza. Su padre era el Infante don Manuel, nieto del rey Fernando III de Castilla el Santo.Juan Manuel era muy rico y se dice que podía cabalgar durante todo un día sin alcanzar el límite de sus propiedades. Había heredado de su padre el título de Duque de Villena, donde pasaba temporadas dedicado a la caza reflejadas en su Libro de la caza.Desde muy joven combatió con destreza y se destacó, junto al rey Sancho IV (su primo), en la Batalla contra los musulmanes del Salado.En 1299 se casó con doña Isabel, infanta de Mallorca. Poco después ella murió y Juan Manuel se casó con doña Constanza de Aragón, hija del rey Jaime II. Algunos años más tarde, otra vez viudo, se casó con doña Blanca Núñez. Fue regente de Castilla durante la minoría de Alfonso XI (1321-1325), y combatió junto a éste contra los musulmanes en la batalla de Algeciras (1343). Su hija Constanza estuvo casada con Pedro de Portugal, episodio reflejado en Reinar después de morir, de Luis Vélez de Guevara (obra publicada por Linkgua).Hacia 1345 abandonó la política y se dedicó a la literatura y la meditación religiosa, murió en 1348 en Córdoba. Muchos de sus escritos se han perdido, como el Libro de los Cantares, colección de poesías y Reglas cómo se debe trovar, el más antiguo tratado castellano de versificación.Escribió asimismo el Libro de los Estados, varios textos históricos y el Libro infinito, llamado también de los castigos."