Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Der Warenkorb ist leer.
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.
Auf Augenhöhe
ISBN/GTIN

Auf Augenhöhe

Mal anders gesehen
BuchGebunden
EUR14,80

Produktbeschreibung

Mit Autoren und Preisträgern des literarischen Förderpreises 2008 sowie Zeichnungen von Jürgen Weing. Schau mir in die Augen, Kleines - und Ingrid Bergmann blickt auf, schaut hoch in das Gesicht von Humphrey Bogart. Kein Gespräch auf (gleicher) Augenhöhe, so würden wir heute sagen, wenn wir uns für einen Moment der Dramatik der Casablanca -Schlussszene entziehen und die vertikale Positionierung der Augen nüchtern analysieren.Aber Vorsicht! Augenhöhe ist ein räumlich-körperlicher, aber auch ein sozialer Begriff , weiß Wikipedia, und das Räumlich-Körperliche muss nicht immer mit dem Sozialen einhergehen: Es gibt Menschen, die können auch im Sitzen noch auf einen her- abschauen, wenn man vor ihrem Schreibtisch steht. Wer dieses Kunststück nicht beherrscht, kann sich ja mit uralten Mitteln wie Podesten, Kanzeln, Kathedern oder wenigstens Schuhen mit hohen Absätzen behelfen, um seinen Status gegenüber dem Gesprächspartner zu erhöhen.Dabei: Wie wohltuend sind doch die - wenn auch leider seltenen - Erfahrungen von Begegnungen, die wirklich auf Augenhöhe stattfinden, zwischen gleichberechtigten Partnern, die sich gegenseitig ernst nehmen und respektieren, die auf offene oder versteckte Machtspielchen verzichten - das Ideal der herrschaftsfreien Kommunikation hat ein Philosoph das einmal genannt.Ganz unterschiedliche Antworten auf die mit gesellschaftlichen, politischen, erotischen Statusfragen einhergehenden Fragen (und neue Fragen zu fragwürdig gewordenen Antworten) sind in dem vorliegenden Buch zu finden; es vereinigt die nach Meinung der Jury gelungensten Beiträge zum Schreibwettbewerb Auf Augen- höhe , ausgeschrieben von der literarischen Vereinigung Signatur e. V. in Zusammenarbeit mit der Volksbank Tettnang.Der vielfältige und originelle Umgang mit dem Thema hat die Jury immer wieder mit neuen überraschenden Zugriffen konfrontiert und dadurch das Lesen bis zum letzten der insgesamt über 60 Einsendungen nicht langweilig werden lassen. Da finden sich heitere und ernste Texte, sehr persönliche neben hochpolitischen Beiträgen, Erzählungen aus dem ganz normalen Alltag neben philosophischen Reflexionen, Geschichten mit Lokalflair genauso wie Storys aus weit entfernten Teilen der Welt. Und auch formal zeigt sich eine große Bandbreite: von klassischen Kurzgeschichten über eher reflexiv oder gar meditativ wirkende Prosatexte bis hin zu Gedichten unterschiedlichster Art. Hajo Fickus. (Jurymitglied Signatur).Eine sehr schöne Ergänzung und Bereicherung sind die Zeichnungen des Künstlers Jürgen Weing. Charakteristisch für die Werke des heute am Bodensee lebenden Lyrikers und Künstlers ist die Reduzierung auf das Wesentliche - die bewegte Linie.Was wäre das Buch ohne die künstlerisch-gestalterische Hand von Natalie Niethammer. Die Medien- und Web-Designerin gründete 2002 die Agentur KLEXX und hat seitdem zahlreiche Bücher, unter anderem die Signatur-Werke Dichter am Tag , Mausklick und Treibholz zu einem ganz besonderen Kunstwerk werden lassen. Auch die jüngste Neuerscheinung trägt die unvergleichliche Handschrift der begabten Frau: Außergewöhnlich, ansprechend und vor allem mit viel Liebe zum Detail ist ein gelungenes Buch entstanden, das schon auf den ersten Blick Lesefreude vermittelt.
Weiterlesen

Details

ISBN/GTIN978-3-9804163-3-7
ProduktartBuch
EinbandGebunden
VerlagSignatur
Erscheinungsdatum22.10.2009
Auflageungekürzt
SpracheDeutsch
Gewicht290 g
Illustrationen18 farbige Zeichnungen
Artikel-Nr.1033648
KatalogVLB
Datenquelle-Nr.04a29f31993b4244a2c9e26684ae0c4b
Weitere Details

Reihe

Bewertungen

Empfehlungen zu ähnlichen Produkten

Das neue "Delfi. Magazin für neue Literatur" hält sein Versprechen: Sowohl die Beiträge sind thematisch vielfältig, als auch die Auswahl der aktuellen literarischen Stimmen der deutschsprachigen und internationalen Literatur. Ein gelungener Versuch das Medium neu zu beleben.
Und der Wechsel in der Form ist überzeugend zwischen Prosa, Lyrik, Comic und Interview.
Ist ein Autor:innen-Leben eigentlich ohne die Lektüre von Franz Kafka möglich (und sinnvoll)? Die über 20 Beiträge dieses Bandes vermitteln den Leser:innen, dass es ohne ihn gar nicht geht. Und auch mein Leseleben hätte mit Abzug dieses vor 100 Jahren verstorbenen Autors anders ausgesehen. Ohne ihn wäre ich nicht zu Haruki Murakami oder Robert Gwisdek gekommen, hätte magisch-realistische Romane vielleicht anders (oder gar nicht?) rezipiert. Mit der Kafka-Brille ergab alles plötzlich viel mehr Sinn. Die Anthologie beweist aufs Beste, dass eben noch nicht alles gesagt und geschrieben wurde zum Werke Kafkas. Egal welche Erzählung, welchen Briefwechsel, welchen der unvollendeten Romane man anschaut - es gibt Jahr um Jahr neues zu erforschen. Egal, ob die Autor:innen dieses Bandes ihre eigene Schreibbiographie anhand von Kafka-Lektüren nachzeichnen oder ganz genau an einen Text herantreten, es macht als Kafka-Begeisterte Freude daran teilzuhaben. Im Kopf geblieben sind mir Isabelle Lehn, die über die Tagebücher schrieb und den Trost des Alleinseins mit sich und seinen Gedanken. Esther Kinsky nähert sich bspw. ebenfalls über die Tagebücher und Sasha Marianna Salzmann widmet sich einer queeren Lesart in der "Beschreibung eines Kampfes". Spannende Ansätze - und fragte man mich, hätte ich wohl über einen von Kafkas Tiertexten schreiben wollen - über seinen "Bericht für eine Akademie".
Wenn ich ehrlich sein soll, war ich nicht sonderlich begeistert über die Auswahl der Geschichten in dieser neuen Anthologie. "Auf dem Friedhof", "Die Mondfinsternis", "Statistik" & "Gejammer" sind vier wunderbar illustre Kurztexte, die hier überzeugen durch Tschechows Witz.
Die Langerzählungen über unglückliche Liebe(n) oder Affären reizten mich leider nicht: weder "Ariadna" noch "Späte Blumen" überzeugten. Das Sujet von Ariadna ist in "Die Dame mit dem Hündchen" so viel besser umgesetzt.
Tschechow als Beobachter der widrigen Zustände in der russischen Landbevölkerung, die Verarmung des Adels, der Standesdünkel ist nach wie vor gut porträtiert, aber der Band machte so gar keine Lust auf mehr. Bin etwas ratlos, was die Intention dieser Zusammenstellung war. (Unglückliche) Liebesgeschichten sind außerdem nicht Tschechows größte Stärke. Ach.
Insgesamt eine richtig schöne Anthologie, in der das Thema "Gefühle" aber wohl vorherrschender ist als der "Frühling". Blühende Landschaften und Gärten gibt es aber trotz allem hier und da zu erlesen und man kann den Kopf ruhig auch komplett literarisch ins Grüne tauchen bei Bedarf.
Trotz der Reichhaltigkeit anderer Bände mit Tschechow-Erzählungen, die ich in den letzten Jahren las, waren in dieser neuen Anthologie doch reichlich Texte dabei, die mir noch unbekannt waren. Ebenso große Freude machte aber auch das erneute Lesen bestimmter Werke, bspw. "Der schwarze Mönch", "Der Literaturlehrer", "Verotschka" und "Auf dem Fuhrwerk".
Die Mischung in diesem Band gelingt im Übrigen gar nicht so schlecht: es werden kurze heitere Erzählungen aus dem Frühwerk sehr passend mit etwas umfangreicheren eher tragischen Geschichten abgewechselt. Tschechow bekommt von mir ohnehin fast immer eine Empfehlung!
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
"Meine stille Nacht. 12 Geschichten vom Werden" versammelt Kurzgeschichten über besonders prägende Momente oder Lebensereignisse. Das Schreiben und ein Nachdenken während der Nacht ist den Texten gemein. Die Episoden sind thematisch breit gefächert und beschäftigen sich mit Momenten, die ein besonderes literarisches Innehalten in der Stille auslösten: Die Verantwortung für den richtigen Kindesnamen (Streeruwitz), den Unterschied zwischen Glauben und Wissen (Birnbacher), über Trauer und Sehnsucht (Ani), über Perseiden und Mauersegler (Wonneberger), und viele mehr (Schami, Grjasnowa, Franzobel,...). Literarische Impressionen für ruhige Momente.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
A short and comparatively easy-to-read British classic from 1886 about the duality of human nature. Stephenson's linguistic eloquence is a pleasure to consume!
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
It's admittedly slightly too late for this recommendation, but then again the Italian April is arguably more equal to the German May. An absolutely delightful holiday novel about four women escaping to a romantic Italian castle for some time to themselves - only to be literally spellbound by it. Read it for the lush Italian gardens and the irresistible spring airs - maby skim over some of the more dated romantic version of musical chairs.
A classic I ran across on my neverending to-read pile and finished within a few hours. The simple writing style made it enjoyable and easy to read, even if it was first published in 1900 and the language is somewhat rigid. It becoming a classic is well deserved - though I must say I'm not interested in the volumes that follow after this first one.

Schlagworte