Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Der Warenkorb ist leer.
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.
The Case of the Initial Letter
ISBN/GTIN

The Case of the Initial Letter

Charles Dickens and the politics of the dual alphabet
BuchGebunden
EUR130,00

Produktbeschreibung

This book analyses attempts by Dickens and other nineteenth-century writers to challenge the established ways of distinguishing between upper and lower case letters in the interests of wider radicalism.Hazlitt's claim that in the wake of the French revolution, 'capital letters are no more allowed in print than letters patent of nobility are allowed in real life … Everything must be reduced to an absolute level' simplifies an important truth: the dual alphabet works metaphorically on the basis of visual appearance. Elevated letters are for elevated things.This work makes links between Dickens and Marx, whose translator - Manchester lawyer Samuel Moore - adapted Das Kapital (1867) to English conventions of capitalisation in Capital (1987). Millicent Garrett Fawcett referred to 'Woman' and 'Man' rather than 'women and 'men' as a reaction to Dickens's satires on the talk of activist women and influenced the proto-modernist innovations of fellow suffragist Augusta Webster, who removed the initial capital from the verse line in Portraits (1870).Decisions about capitalisation have traditionally been made by publishers rather than writers. Dickens's manuscripts, corrected proofs and 'prompt copies' for public Readings reveal his growing awareness of the social relations of literary production and reception and of the dual alphabet as largely inaudible. Partly in consequence, his later novels recast class in terms of peoples' access to different forms of language.This exploration of unconventional capitals will find its home with students and lecturers in the literary and cultural history of the English-speaking world as well as students of Dickens, Marx and suffragist feminism.
Weiterlesen

Details

ISBN/GTIN978-1-5261-4629-8
ProduktartBuch
EinbandGebunden
Erscheinungsdatum21.07.2020
SpracheEnglisch
MasseBreite 145 mm, Höhe 222 mm, Dicke 14 mm
Gewicht372 g
Artikel-Nr.18031109
KatalogLibri
Datenquelle-Nr.A39693743
Weitere Details

Bewertungen

Empfehlungen zu ähnlichen Produkten

Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!

Autor/in