Merkliste
Die Merkliste ist leer.
Der Warenkorb ist leer.
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Kostenloser Versand möglich
Bitte warten - die Druckansicht der Seite wird vorbereitet.
Der Druckdialog öffnet sich, sobald die Seite vollständig geladen wurde.
Sollte die Druckvorschau unvollständig sein, bitte schliessen und "Erneut drucken" wählen.

Nach(t)denken

Gedanken um drei Uhr nachts
BuchKartoniert, Paperback
EUR10,00

Produktbeschreibung

Mal wieder ist es mitten in der Nacht.
Mal wieder habe ich zu viel nach(t)gedacht.
Hab geschrieben, die Zeit aus den Augen verloren,
dabei habe ich mir auf Schlaf geschworen...

Ines Strohmaier zeichnet sich durch genaue Beobachtungsgabe, Empathie für gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen und tiefgründige Gedankengänge aus. Gekonnt versteht es die junge Kleinwalsertalerin ihre Gefühlswelten in Reim, Rhythmus und Rap zu verpacken. Mit ihrer modernen Form der Lyrik spricht sie nicht nur die Poetry-Slam-Szene an, sondern alle, die den Zeitgeist aus der Sichtweise einer jungen Autorin kennenlernen wollen.
Weiterlesen

Details

ISBN/GTIN978-3-8457-0322-0
ProduktartBuch
EinbandKartoniert, Paperback
VerlagUNIKUM
Erscheinungsdatum21.09.2018
SpracheDeutsch
MasseBreite 120 mm, Höhe 190 mm, Dicke 8 mm
Gewicht155 g
Artikel-Nr.10724367
KatalogLibri
Datenquelle-Nr.A34963422
Weitere Details

Bewertungen

Empfehlungen zu ähnlichen Produkten

Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Jane Austen is a writer ruined by TV adaptation (before you all start writing letters, I know there are good ones). Despite two centuries of inclusion in the canon, there are still many (and I am afraid they are mostly men) who dismiss her as 'frivolous', 'saccharine' or 'unserious'. This means it is only worth continuing to discuss Austen with people if they either don't use any of the aforementioned adjectives or if, by the latter, they mean, she is one of the funniest writers in English (full stop). If you don't know this already, the first page of 'Persuasion' will convince you, and then her biting, satirical commentary on Georgian society will show you that far from reverently writing about it out of admiration, she irreverently lambasts it and its eccentric snobbish hierarchy (people who write her off will probably say John Oliver likes Trump because both wear suits). If you don't believe me (and even if you do), read her (and start with 'Persuasion') before you watch her.
Whoa. What a devastating read! A dystopia in the darkest sense of the word - without a happy ending whatsoever (that's how I interpret it at least).
A must-read classic.

You'll never think of rats the same way again!

Autor/in